Thursday, April 28, 2005

Take Your Daughter (and/or son) to Work Day

Today is "take your daughter and/or son to work day." Initially this day's purpose was, "for girls to achieve their full potential, whether it is in the home, workplace, or community, boys also must be encouraged to reach their potential by participating fully in family, work, and community." Now the program has been expanded to include boys.
I think "take your daughter to work" is a great concept. I, myself, participated in this activity as a child and I learned a lot by going to work with my dad. But why must the day be scheduled during the school year? Kids (who participate in this program) typically have 3 months over the summer, 2 weeks off in December, and 1 week off in the spring, to go to work with parents. Their vacation time provides parents with amble time to take their children to work. Why take time away from the already short school year to do something that parents should insist on during one day of their kids' vacation? I mean, doesn't telling kids that they can dismiss their responsibilities as a child enrolled in school to skip classes send the wrong message?
According to the program, taking a child during a school day is an important part of the learning process. "Take Our Daughters And Sons To Work Day is organized during the school year so girls and boys can take what they learn in workplaces on Thursday and apply it to the classroom on Friday. By involving whole communities—schools, girls and boys, parents, workplaces, and mentors—the program helps young people make connections between what they learn in school and their future goals."
I don't buy it. Of course the program is a great idea and helps kids grasp the working world that their parents face everyday, but at whose expense is this program really benefitting?

Archives:    January 2005    February 2005    March 2005    April 2005    May 2005    June 2005    July 2005    August 2005    September 2005    October 2005    November 2005    December 2005    January 2006    February 2006    March 2006    April 2006    May 2006    June 2006    July 2006    August 2006    September 2006    October 2006    November 2006    December 2006    January 2007    February 2007    March 2007    April 2007    May 2007    July 2007    August 2007    September 2007    October 2007    November 2007    January 2008    February 2008    March 2008    April 2008    May 2008    June 2008    July 2008    August 2008    September 2008    October 2008    November 2008    December 2008    January 2009    February 2009    March 2009    April 2009    May 2009    June 2009    July 2009    August 2009    September 2009    October 2009    November 2009    December 2009    January 2010    February 2010    March 2010    April 2010    May 2010    June 2010    July 2010    August 2010    September 2010    October 2010    November 2010    December 2010    January 2011    February 2011    March 2011    April 2011    May 2011    June 2011    July 2011    August 2011    September 2011    October 2011    November 2011    December 2011    January 2012    February 2012    March 2012    April 2012    May 2012    June 2012    July 2012    August 2012    September 2012    October 2012    November 2012    December 2012    January 2013    February 2013    March 2013    April 2013    May 2013    June 2013    July 2013    August 2013    September 2013    October 2013    November 2013    December 2013    January 2014    February 2014    March 2014    April 2014    May 2014    June 2014